ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Analysis of factors affecting smooth extubation in delayed extubation patients following intracranial surgery: an ambispective cohort study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomogram prediction model for delayed extubation in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Nurse-performed diaphragm ultrasound integrated with spontaneous breathing trial criteria for risk stratification of extubation outcomes in neurosurgical critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDelayed extubation is common after intracranial surgery, and is associated with adverse reactions that compromise patient safety and comfort. Identifying factors that influence smooth extubation is therefore critical, but available evidence is limited. This study aims to explore risk factors of extubation adverse outcomes in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery, with the goal of enhancing extubation safety and patient comfort.
methodsAn ambispective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital from May 2022 to September 2023, involving 157 patients with delayed extubation post-intracranial surgery. Clinical data encompassing demographic characteristics, neurological status, respiratory parameters, intraoperative and anesthetic management, and postoperative factors. Smooth extubation was defined as extubation with stable blood pressure, respiratory function, and absence of pain or agitation. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent factors influencing adverse extubation.
resultsOf 157 patients (mean BMI 23.88 ± 3.25 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.