ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring health and allied science students' achievement emotions profiles: a person-centered analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile achievement emotions have gained prominence in education, research remains scarce in interprofessional education (IPE) contexts where students also experience complex combinations of emotions. This study uses a person-centered approach to explore health and allied science students' achievement emotions profiles in an IPE setting, capturing the full spectrum of emotional experiences, to identify clusters of achievement emotions in profiles, clarify between-profile differences, and establish the link between such profiles and student outcomes.
methodsWe measured the participants' achievement emotions, team experience, and satisfaction with life using validated scales, as well as their team readiness and overall IPE performance. Data from 240 Chinese healthcare and allied science students enrolled in an interprofessional education simulation were analysed via a person-centred approach using K-means cluster analysis, multiple analysis of variance, and t-tests.
resultsThree achievement emotion profiles emerged: positive (34%; high positive, low negative), low (28%; low positive, low negative), and mixed (38%; moderate positive, moderate negative). Students with positive profiles showed significantly higher team satisfaction, life satisfaction, and overall IPE performance compared to other clusters. Additional analyses revealed discipline differences, with Law (64%) and Nursing (45%) students showing the highest proportions of positive profiles. Gender analyses indicated that female students reported significantly higher positive emotions and lower negative emotions than male students.
conclusionsThis study identified three achievement emotion profiles, with students showing positive emotion profiles demonstrating significantly better team satisfaction, life satisfaction, and IPE performance. Discipline and gender differences suggest that targeted interventions based on emotion profiles could potentially optimize student outcomes in collaborative healthcare education settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.