ArticleBMC health services research2025
Effect of healthcare worker vs. non-health worker delivered health education on modern contraceptive uptake among women in Malawi: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in contraceptive use, skilled birth attendance, and fertility in Malawi (2015-2024).BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost women receive health education from healthcare workers. However, the same information can be delivered by non-health workers such as religious and traditional leaders, and peers, among others. The effectiveness of non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of hormonal contraceptives, however, remains uncertain. We compared the effectiveness of health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in two large districts in Malawi.
methodsWe designed a quasi-experimental study in two Malawian districts (Mangochi and Chikwawa). The intervention was health education delivered by either a health worker, such as a nurse (intervention group), while the comparator was health education delivered by a non-health worker, like a religious or traditional leader, peer, or the media, among others (comparison group). The main outcome was the uptake of modern contraceptives. To remove systematic differences between the two groups and achieve comparability on observed covariates, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting to emulate a randomized trial. After achieving covariate comparability, we performed a binary logistic regression to estimate the effect of health worker-delivered health education on contraceptive uptake, adjusting for the inverse probability of treatment weights. We reported the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsWe studied 414 participants aged 15–49 years (median age 29 years, interquartile range 23–36). There were 316 participants in the intervention group, and 143 (45.3%) of them used modern contraceptives. The comparison group had 98 participants, and 41 (41.8%) of them used modern contraceptives (p = 0.552). Participants in the intervention group tended to have an increased modern contraceptive uptake compared to those in the comparison group, although the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.74–2.89).
conclusionsModern contraceptive uptake did not differ between health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education approaches in the two Malawian districts. Non-health worker-delivered health education could be an additional tool for reaching several women of reproductive age with modern contraceptive information. This would contribute to increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate and reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in these districts and similar settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.