Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41163141›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Effect of healthcare worker vs. non-health worker delivered health education on modern contraceptive uptake among women in Malawi: a quasi-experimental study.

Thom Salamba, Jonathan Izudi, Tumaini Masegese, Gabriel Mwila, Ibrahima Gueye, Grace Kyule, Sadie Khakayi, Annaline Karan, Ruth Vellemu, Daniel Mwanga and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thom SalambaAmref Health Africa, Nairobi, Kenya. salambathom@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0573-5860
Jonathan IzudiDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-0389
Tumaini MasegeseAmref Health Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gabriel MwilaAmref Health Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4821-9149
Ibrahima GueyeAmref Health Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace KyuleAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9721-6866
Sadie KhakayiAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Annaline KaranAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Ruth VellemuAmref Health Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel MwangaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-1538
Mulusew J GerbabaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost women receive health education from healthcare workers. However, the same information can be delivered by non-health workers such as religious and traditional leaders, and peers, among others. The effectiveness of non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of hormonal contraceptives, however, remains uncertain. We compared the effectiveness of health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education on the uptake of modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in two large districts in Malawi.

methodsWe designed a quasi-experimental study in two Malawian districts (Mangochi and Chikwawa). The intervention was health education delivered by either a health worker, such as a nurse (intervention group), while the comparator was health education delivered by a non-health worker, like a religious or traditional leader, peer, or the media, among others (comparison group). The main outcome was the uptake of modern contraceptives. To remove systematic differences between the two groups and achieve comparability on observed covariates, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting to emulate a randomized trial. After achieving covariate comparability, we performed a binary logistic regression to estimate the effect of health worker-delivered health education on contraceptive uptake, adjusting for the inverse probability of treatment weights. We reported the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsWe studied 414 participants aged 15–49 years (median age 29 years, interquartile range 23–36). There were 316 participants in the intervention group, and 143 (45.3%) of them used modern contraceptives. The comparison group had 98 participants, and 41 (41.8%) of them used modern contraceptives (p = 0.552). Participants in the intervention group tended to have an increased modern contraceptive uptake compared to those in the comparison group, although the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.74–2.89).

conclusionsModern contraceptive uptake did not differ between health worker and non-health worker-delivered health education approaches in the two Malawian districts. Non-health worker-delivered health education could be an additional tool for reaching several women of reproductive age with modern contraceptive information. This would contribute to increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate and reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in these districts and similar settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorHealth EducationHealth PersonnelAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalawiYoung AdultCommunity health workersHealth educationModern contraceptive uptakePropensity-score weightingQuasi-experimental

Identifiers

PMID41163141
PMCPMC12570810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.