ArticleBMC cancer2025
Comparing radiomics, deep learning, and fusion models for predicting occult pleural dissemination in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) deep learning radiomics predicts complete response after induction immunochemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccult pleural dissemination (PD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is likely to be missed on computed tomography (CT) scans, associated with poor survival, and generally contraindicated for radical surgery. This study aimed to develop and compare the performance of radiomics-based machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and fusion models to preoperatively identify occult PD in NSCLC patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 326 NSCLC patients from three Chinese high-volume medical centers (2016-2023) were retrospectively collected and divided into training (n = 216), internal test (n = 54), and external test (n = 56) cohorts. Ten radiomics-based ML models and eight DL models were trained using CT images at the maximum cross-sectional slice of the primary tumor. Moreover, another two fusion models (prefusion and postfusion) were developed using feature-based and decision-based methods. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were mainly used to compare the predictive performance of the models.
resultsThe GBM (AUC: 0.821) and DenseNet121 (AUC: 0.764) models achieved the highest AUC among ML and DL models in the external test cohorts, respectively. The postfusion model, integrating the output probabilities from GBM and DenseNet121 models, showed superior performance (AUC: 0.828-0.978) compared to the prefusion model (AUC: 0.817-0.877). Moreover, the postfusion model demonstrated the highest degree of sensitivity (82.1-97.2%) among all models across the three cohorts.
conclusionsThe postfusion model, which integrates radiomics-based ML and DL models, can serve as a sensitive diagnostic tool to predict occult PD in NSCLC patients, thereby helping to avoid unnecessary surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.