ArticleBMC biology2025
A novel method for effectively selecting fragments not associated with restriction sites for whole-genome genotyping.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing (iRAD-seq).Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- The functions of MicroRNAs in myogenesis and their effects in beef cattle meat quality: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReduced representation sequencing (RRS) using Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) has become a widely adopted method for whole-genome genotyping, owing to its cost-effectiveness and applicability across species. However, traditional RAD-seq approaches face challenges, including complex workflows and high labor demands. Existing RAD-seq methods rely primarily on the strategy of "selecting fragments first, then preparing a library," which involves targeting fragments associated with restriction enzyme cut sites.
resultsIn contrast, we developed inverse RAD-seq (iRAD-seq), a novel method that employs a "prepare library first, then select" strategy to efficiently capture fragments not associated with restriction sites for whole-genome genotyping. This innovative approach utilizes Tn5 transposase to simultaneously fragment DNA and ligate adapters, followed by pooled processing of hundreds of libraries for batch restriction digestion, thereby significantly streamlining RAD-seq library preparation. This simplified workflow makes iRAD-seq highly compatible with liquid handling automation, enhancing its throughput. We validated iRAD-seq through both in silico analyses and wet-lab experiments in maize and rice. The results demonstrate that iRAD-seq provides consistent genome-wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) distributions. In maize germplasm, iRAD-seq successfully enables effective genetic diversity analysis. Furthermore, genetic mapping of maize populations has confirmed its utility for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that iRAD-seq offers a more streamlined, efficient, and flexible approach to genotyping and marker development than traditional RAD-seq methods. Owing to its potential for high-throughput applications and cost reductions, iRAD-seq is a valuable tool for genomic research and molecular breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.