Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2025
Analysis of common treatment-related adverse events of donafenib and its correlation with efficacy: exploratory analysis of the ZGDH3 study.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02645981 (Efficacy and Safety of Donafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Donafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Controlled,Multicentre,Randomised, Phase 3 Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDonafenib, a deuterium-modified sorafenib derivative, has improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the treatment-related adverse events and their associations with overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in patients with advanced HCC treated with donafenib.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, data from 334 patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC who had a Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7 and had not received prior systemic treatment were collected from the ZGDH3 study. Donafenib (0.2 g) was administered orally twice daily until either intolerable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The associations between adverse events (AEs) and OS/TTP were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was tested using the log-rank test. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsUnivariate analysis revealed that the median OS (mOS) was significantly longer in patients who experienced Grade 3 hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), diarrhea, Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, hypertension, alopecia, rash, and proteinuria compared to those without these AEs (P < 0.05). Conversely, patients with fatigue and Grade ≥ 3 increased blood bilirubin had significantly shorter mOS than those without these AEs (P < 0.05). HFSR was associated with improved survival outcomes, with the mOS of patients with HFSR being 17.6 months, compared to 7.9 months in those without (HR = 0.498, 95% CI 0.384-0.648, P < 0.0001). The mOS was 14.2 months in patients with Grade ≥ 3 AEs, compared to 10.5 months in those without (HR = 0.687, 95% CI 0.442-0.802, P = 0.0061). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of AEs between patients aged ≥ 65 and those < 65.
conclusionsThe occurrence of HFSR, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, alopecia, rash, proteinuria, fatigue, and Grade ≥ 3 increased blood bilirubin may be associated with the efficacy of donafenib in the treatment of advanced HCC, though these are exploratory associations and not established predictive markers. The AEs associated with donafenib are generally well tolerated, though further validation is needed. TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT02645981.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.