Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41163125›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

A ERSF-VIPA framework: scalable wildlife movement modelling for conflict mitigation.

Xiaoyi Chen, Jie Li, Xinyu Cao, Yin Yang, Colin A Chapman, Xiao Li, Ruijing Qiao, Xiaohuan Wang, Feiling Yang, Dejun Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoyi ChenInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Jie LiInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China. jie_li@ynu.edu.cn.
Xinyu CaoInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Yin YangInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Colin A ChapmanBiology Department, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, V9R 5S5, Canada.
Xiao LiSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, 650301, China.
Ruijing QiaoInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Xiaohuan WangInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Feiling YangInstitute of International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Dejun KongSchool of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, China. kongdj@ynu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Effective conservation planning and conflict mitigation can hinge on accurately modelling wildlife movement paths (WMPs), yet progress is hindered by both a shortage of reliable methods and limited data. The critical challenge, therefore, is to devise limited-data models that faithfully reproduce elusive species' movements and deliver actionable insights for human-wildlife conflict management. 2. We introduce the Enhanced Resource Selection Function-Vector-network Iterative Pathfinding Algorithm (ERSF-VIPA), a novel framework for simulating WMPs with limited data. Drawing on historical occurrence records of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), we assume individuals make rational, goal-driven decisions based on local environmental knowledge. The ERSF employs a random forest on a hexagonal grid to estimate nonlinear resource-selection probabilities, while VIPA conducts an iterative, node-to-node search across that hexagonal vector network-scoring each candidate by combining selection probability with cubic distance coefficients to ensure ecological validity and energetic efficiency. 3. The model demonstrates high accuracy, with 90.3% of the 68 simulated paths approximating the observed paths with an average maximum deviation of 418 m. These findings underscore the model's robustness and its capacity to translate limited tracking data into actionable insights for conservation. 4. ERSF-VIPA operates using only coarse, non-continuous historical data that lack precise timestamps or spatial accuracy. By operating with minimal data requirements, ERSF-VIPA demonstrates exceptional extensibility and broad applicability for reconstructing movement paths of elusive wildlife species. Its proven accuracy in simulating Asian elephant paths further positions it as a potentially powerful decision-support framework for real-time animal monitoring and proactive human-wildlife conflict mitigation.

Indexed as

Asian elephants (elephas maximus)Enhanced resource selection function–vector network iterative pathfinding algorithmHuman-wildlife conflictLimited dataWildlife movement path prediction

Identifiers

PMID41163125
PMCPMC12574237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.