SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Postoperative weight-bearing restrictions and rehabilitation after periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy: An Evidence-Based Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on postoperative rehabilitation strategies, particularly weight-bearing restrictions after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until January 12, 2025. After duplicate removal, studies were screened by title, abstract, and full text using predefined criteria. Studies were included if they reported postoperative weight-bearing protocols after isolated PAO; studies with additional procedures, non-human data, or lacking mobilization details were excluded. Primary endpoints included postoperative weight-bearing instructions, duration of partial weight-bearing, and brace use. Secondary endpoints included hip function, return to sports, and complications. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Bias was assessed using the MINORS tool.
resultsThe majority of studies recommended partial weight-bearing immediately postoperatively, commonly initiated on postoperative day one (18% of studies), typically lasting six (21%) to eight (18%) weeks. Variations included toe-touch, tip-touch, touch-down, flat-foot, protected, or restricted weight-bearing. Crutches were frequently recommended (48%). Bracing was infrequently reported (5%), with limited details provided. Return to sporting activities varied widely, typically recommended between six and twelve months postoperatively. Complication rates were diverse, with delayed weight-bearing showing a lower incidence of pelvic fractures compared to immediate full weight-bearing.
conclusionThis review highlights substantial variability and imprecise terminology in existing PAO mobilization protocols and a lack of standardization. Future research should prioritize prospective comparative studies to clarify safe, effective postoperative mobilization strategies. Establishing standardized, evidence-based rehabilitation guidelines could enhance patient outcomes, reduce complications, and decrease practice variability following PAO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.