ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
New lung ultrasound system for rapid triage of pulmonary disease without a radiologist or sonographer.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost people in the world lack access to medical imaging including for assessment of pulmonary disease. We sought to improve access to pulmonary imaging by developing a rapid automated system for triage of pulmonary disease using lung ultrasound requiring neither a radiologist nor experienced sonographer utilizing volume sweep imaging (VSI) and artificial intelligence (AI).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of lung ultrasound VSI data collected from May 2019 to January 2020. AI analysis utilizing a convolutional neural network and random forest-based machine learning classifier was performed on 70 normal lung ultrasound VSI video clips and 49 abnormal lung ultrasound VSI video clips obtained by individuals without prior ultrasound experience. The accuracy of the AI was assessed for the ability to distinguish between normal and abnormal lung ultrasound video clips.
resultsAmong test VSI clips (n = 36 clips), AI achieved 91.7% accuracy, 85.7% sensitivity, 95.5% specificity, and an F1 score of 0.89 for an abnormal lung ultrasound VSI clip. Among test subjects (n = 20) from which these clips were obtained, 90.0% accuracy, 87.5% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and an F1 score of 0.88 were achieved.
conclusionsLung ultrasound VSI integrated with AI shows potential to provide preliminary triage of pulmonary disease allowing a system for rapid automatic triage of pulmonary disease requiring neither a radiologist nor sonographer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.