Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162968›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

BRCAGenie: A machine learning-driven 43-gene polygenic risk score model for precision prediction of breast cancer survival.

Jia Wei Lee, Ashley Jun Wei Lim, Chengyi Wang, Jun Hao Neo, Lee Jin Lim, Samuel S Chong, Caroline G Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jia Wei LeeDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.
Ashley Jun Wei LimDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.
Chengyi WangDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Jun Hao NeoDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.
Lee Jin LimDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore.
Samuel S ChongDepartment of Paediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Caroline G LeeDepartment of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117596, Singapore. bchleec@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-3635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies globally, imposing a substantial disease burden. Its inherent heterogeneity complicates prognosis and treatment, underscoring the need for accurate survival prediction models to guide personalised clinical decision-making. Existing studies on breast cancer survival prediction models based on gene expression have largely focused on predefined subsets of genes, such as biologically-relevant, differentially-expressed or protein-coding genes, potentially overlooking critical but uncharacterised genomic contributors. To probe deeper beyond well-characterised biological pathways and differential gene expression, this study adopts an unbiased, hypothesis-free approach by conducting machine learning-based survival analysis on the entire transcriptome, rather than restricted gene subsets, to identify a novel gene signature for the development of a robust and accurate risk score model for breast cancer survival prediction.

methodsThe clinical and transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Cancer (TCGA-BRCA) were analysed. Feature selection was conducted using univariate Cox, LASSO Cox regression and stepwise selection. The selected gene signature was then used to construct a risk score model, following which model performance was evaluated using AUC(t), Kaplan-Meier curves (with the Log-Rank test), Harrell's C-index and calibration plots. The Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE96058) cohorts served as external validation sets.

resultsHere, we present Breast Cancer Genie (BRCAGenie), a 43-gene polygenic risk score model that can reasonably predict breast cancer survival using gene expression, achieving three-year and five-year AUC(t) scores of 0.736 and 0.751 respectively in the TCGA unseen test set and significant separation of the Kaplan-Meier curves. When age at diagnosis was included, the three-year and five-year AUC(t) scores of the combined BRCAGenie model improved to 0.812 and 0.814 respectively in the unseen test set. The identified signature demonstrates promising biological relevance, with many genes supported by existing cancer literature, and others representing potentially novel biomarkers. To facilitate clinical application, the BRCAGenie calculator was developed: https://jiaweilee.shinyapps.io/breast_cancer_survival_43/ .

conclusionsThe development of an accurate breast cancer polygenic risk score model for survival prediction enables robust prognostic stratification for personalised clinical decision-making. Through our unbiased, hypothesis-free approach, we have identified novel breast cancer prognostic biomarkers with the potential to be clinically validated and translated into relevant diagnostics and therapeutics.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningMultifactorial InheritanceFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Risk ScoreHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTranscriptomeBiomarkerBreast cancerMachine learningPolygenic risk scoreSurvival analysisTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41162968
PMCPMC12574034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.