ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Prognostic significance of lymph node yield in pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: population-based study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical cystectomy (RC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). While PLND improves staging and local control, the optimal extent is debated. This study used the SEER database (2000–2021) to evaluate lymph node yield's (LNY) prognostic significance.
methodsWe included 12,698 patients who underwent PLND, stratified by LNY quartiles (cutoffs at 12, 19, and 29). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Cox regression, Kaplan–Meier curves, and competing risk models assessed the impact of LNY on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A prognostic nomogram incorporating LNY was developed and validated using LASSO regression, the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots.
resultsThe optimal threshold for LNY was determined to be 12, with LNY ≥ 12 associated with a 17% reduction in all-cause mortality risk (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88). An increase in LNY was correlated with improvements in OS and CSS, with the 5-year OS rate increasing from 46.0% to 55.6%. A nonlinear relationship between LNY and all-cause mortality risk was observed, as the protective effect diminished after exceeding 39.
conclusionsThis study supports the establishment of LNY threshold of 12 as an indicator of surgical completeness; an LNY of 20–39 may be associated with a sustained protective effect. However, excessive LNY may not yield additional benefits. Clinical decision-making should consider patient characteristics and healthcare accessibility to optimize outcomes for bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.