ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Pretrained language models for semantics-aware data harmonisation of observational clinical studies in the era of big data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An informatics framework to harmonize electronic health record medication data for managed care analytics and artificial intelligence applications.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Article
- Value of using artificial intelligence derived clusters by health and social care need in primary care: A qualitative interview study with patients living with multiple long-term conditions, carers and health care professionals.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn clinical research, there is a strong drive to leverage big data from population cohort studies and routine electronic healthcare records to design new interventions, improve health outcomes and increase the efficiency of healthcare delivery. However, realising these potential demands requires substantial efforts in harmonising source datasets and curating study data, which currently relies on costly, time-consuming and labour-intensive methods. We explore and assess the use of natural language processing (NLP) and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to address the challenges of big data semantic harmonisation and curation.
methodsOur aim is to establish an efficient and robust technological foundation for the development of automated tools supporting data curation of large clinical datasets. We propose two AI based pipelines for automated semantic harmonisation: a pipeline for semantics-aware search for domain relevant variables and a pipeline for clustering of semantically similar variables. We evaluate pipeline performance using 94,037 textual variable descriptions from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) database.
resultsWe observe high accuracy of our Semantic Search pipeline, with an AUC of 0.899 (SD = 0.056). Our semantic clustering pipeline achieves a V-measure of 0.237 (SD = 0.157), which is on par with that of leading implementations in other relevant domains. Automation can significantly accelerate the process of dataset harmonisation. Manual labelling was performed at a speed of 2.1 descriptions per minute, with our automated labelling increasing speed to 245 descriptions per minute.
conclusionsOur study findings underscore the potential of AI technologies, such as NLP and unsupervised ML, in automating the harmonisation and curation of big data for clinical research. By establishing a robust technological foundation, we pave the way for the development of automated tools that streamline the process, enabling health data scientists to leverage big data more efficiently and effectively in their studies and accelerating insights from data for clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.