ArticleBMC biology2025
Prey evasiveness and masking noise jointly promote the ultrahigh call rate in echolocating bats.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmong mammals, only bats and toothed whales are known to produce > 160 calls per second, which occurs shortly before these echolocators capture their prey. This high call rate phase, dubbed terminal buzz, is powered by rare superfast muscles. The enigmatic terminal buzz of bats is hypothesized to have evolved in response to the challenges of capturing flying insects. However, it remains unclear why some bats produce a full terminal buzz sequence when capturing stationary, inescapable prey, such as insect larvae suspended in the air. Here, we recorded bats performing foraging and orientation tasks in a laboratory setting, both with and without acoustic masking noise.
resultsWe discovered that masking noise selectively enhanced the call rate of Pratt's roundleaf bats during foraging, but not during landing tasks. We found that the prevalence and elaboration of terminal buzz in these bats were determined by prey evasiveness, with the most frequent and elaborated terminal buzz occurring for bats capturing flying insects. Unlike other reported aerial hawking bats, the Pratt's roundleaf bats did not exhibit a terminal buzz when capturing stationary, inescapable insect larvae. Surprisingly, the absence of terminal buzz can be instantly restored by exposing bats to masking noise. In contrast, masking noise had only a minimal effect on the buzz-like calls produced during a landing task.
conclusionsWe posit that prey evasiveness and masking noise, two primary challenges faced by both echolocating bats and toothed whales, jointly drove the evolution of the ultrahigh call rate of terminal buzz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.