ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Analysis of a rare case of vaginitis caused by Trichomonas vaginalis combined with fungal infection.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVaginitis is an inflammatory condition of the vagina commonly caused by infection with various pathogens. It is primarily characterized by vulvar or vaginal pruritus and increased vaginal discharge, which may exhibit abnormal color or odor. Causative agents include bacteria, fungi, and Trichomonas vaginalis (T. vaginalis), among others. Clinically, vaginitis may present as a monoinfection or as a mixed infection involving multiple pathogens. Notably, co-infections involving both T. vaginalis and fungi are relatively rare. CASE PRESENTATION: In our report, we described a case of vaginitis accompanied by T. vaginalis and fungal infection. Through microscopic examination of the patient’s vaginal discharge using the hanging-drop method, Wright-Giemsa staining method, and immunofluorescence staining method, numerous yeast cells, hyphae, and a small number of motile T. vaginalis were observed. To accurately identify the fungal strain, we conducted a pathogen culture. Colonies were detected growing on blood agar plates and Sabouraud agar plates. Mass spectrometry analysis was then employed to identify the isolated strain as Candida albicans (C. albicans). Based on these findings, clinicians formulated a targeted treatment plan.
conclusionsVaginitis with a co-infection of T. vaginalis and fungi is relatively uncommon, and it is easy to overlook during laboratory examinations. Multiple detection methods should be employed to verify test results, providing robust support for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive microbiological investigation in patients with atypical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.