ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Comprehensive prenatal and postnatal analysis of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: a single-center study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBy analyzing the clinical information and prognosis of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome, a more comprehensive disease information was obtained.
methodsRetrospective analysis of cases prenatally diagnosed with 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome at the Centre. Collecting and analysing clinical data on cases, including demographics of pregnant women, imaging, prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy outcomes and live birth follow-up.
resultsA total of 52 cases were included in the study, including 39 cases (75%) in the first-second trimester and 13 cases (25%) in the third trimester. There were 37 cases of congenital heart disease (71.2%). Forty-eight cases (92.3%) chose termination of pregnancy (TOP), and four cases chose to retain the fetus. The surgical outcome of live births was good, but there were delays in motor, language or cognitive retardation.
conclusionThe study demonstrates the significant importance of prenatal screening, diagnosis and follow-up in this disease. The relevant prognosis can provide pregnant women with pregnancy options, formulate pregnancy management and postpartum follow-up plans, which enable early intervention to improve the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.