ArticleBMC genomics2025
Proteomic signature of aging in bloodstain samples: a preliminary study.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-Since-Deposition Signatures for Canine Blood Based on Cellular Autofluorescence.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAge estimation from biological samples remains a critical challenge in forensic investigations, particularly when analyzing trace or degraded biological stains recovered from crime scenes. While DNA methylation has gained attention as a potential epigenetic clock for age prediction, practical limitations that include the requirements for bisulfite conversion and environmental interference hinder its forensic utility. Previous studies have shown that proteins are more stable than DNA and that certain proteins are highly age-related and gender-differentiated, indicating that proteomic signatures present a promising alternative for biological age determination. However, proteomic data from bloodstains have not yet been used for forensic age prediction. In this pilot study, we used the high-resolution Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer to investigate the proteomic signatures of aging in bloodstain samples from 40 healthy males (aged 10–79 years) stored for 4 years at room temperature (20–25 °C). Age-related proteins were subsequently selected for age prediction. We further simplified the characteristic variables using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression and the Boruta algorithm, and established age prediction models for bloodstains based on Random Forest (RF) machine learning.
resultsIn total, 1,655 proteins were identified, which showed four different nonlinear change patterns during the aging process. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) was calculated, and 71 proteins were found to correlate significantly with age (Pearson’s |R| > 0.3, P < 0.05), including 26 positively and 45 negatively correlated proteins. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that age-associated proteins were markedly enriched in pathways related to endocytosis, metabolism, and neurodegenerative disease. Feature selection using the Lasso regression and the Boruta algorithm resulted in the identification of 18 and 10 age-associated proteins, respectively, with six overlapping proteins (including ITIH3, HSPA9, SNAP91, FTL, XPO4, and NCF2). RF regression models were constructed using different feature sets: Lasso-selected (18 proteins), Boruta-selected (10 proteins), their intersection (6 proteins), and R-value-based filtering (e.g., top 7 proteins with |R| > 0.4, P < 0.05). The Boruta-based model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an R² of 0.70 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 9.14 years for the testing set.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the potential of bloodstain proteomics for age estimation. This study provides a foundation for further validation in larger cohorts and diverse forensic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.