Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162812›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

How mothers and fathers support adult childhood cancer survivors: parental attitudes, involvement, and motivation toward long-term follow-up care (results from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - Parents).

Julia Baenziger, Anica Ilic, Tamara Diesch-Furlanetto, André O von Bueren, Grit Sommer, Gisela Michel, Manya J Hendriks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia BaenzigerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Anica IlicFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Tamara Diesch-FurlanettoDepartemnt of Pediatic Oncology/Hematology, Children's Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
André O von BuerenDepartment of PediatricsGynecology and Obstetrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Grit SommerInstitute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gisela MichelFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland. gisela.michel@unilu.ch.
Manya J HendriksFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany childhood cancer survivors (CCS) do not attend long-term follow-up (LTFU) care. We examined (1) the involvement of mothers and fathers, (2) their attitudes towards LTFU, (3) how they motivated their adult children to attend, (4) and parents' perceptions of the healthcare professionals involved and the decision to end LTFU care.

methodsA population-based sample (Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry) of parents of long-term CCS (> 5 years post-diagnosis, ≥ 20 years at study) responded to a questionnaire. Multiple-choice and open-ended questions were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi2 comparisons, and qualitative content analyses.

resultsOf 302 families, 190 fathers (40.7%) and 276 mothers participated. One in four (26.1%) parents were involved in LTFU, providing medical, preventative/practical, and emotional support (mothers > fathers, p = 0.013). Parents of LTFU attenders were pleased with attendance (94.3%), providing them with reassurance about their child's health. Parents of non-attenders did not wish their child attended LTFU (74.7%), because of their perceptions (e.g., 'being cured'), respect for the child's decision, or the need to move on. Parents (53.5%) motivated attenders (mothers > fathers, p = 0.002) by talking about importance, helping to schedule, and reminding. General practitioners (64.3%) and adult oncologists (31.9%) most often provided LTFU. The decision to end LTFU was made by the treating physician (53.4%), survivors (18.4%), or shared decision-making (17.5%).

conclusionThere is unused potential for parents to motivate their children to participate in LTFU. The variety of LTFU models can be difficult to navigate; thus, working to improve visibility and encouragement might help increase attendance.

Indexed as

AftercareCancer SurvivorsFathersMothersNeoplasmsParentsAdultAdult ChildrenChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSocial SupportChildhood cancerCohortFollow-upHealth promotionLong-termParents

Identifiers

PMID41162812
PMCPMC12572037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.