Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162797›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

A Novel Design Strategy for Customized Polyetheretherketone Implants in Paranasal Augmentation Through Surgeon-Engineer Collaboration.

Qi Jin, Yu He, Binghang Li, Hengyuan Ma, Hao Qu, Danying Wang, XiaoLei Jin, Xiaojun Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qi Jin *Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33# Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China.
Yu He *Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33# Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China.
Binghang LiDepartment of Digital Technology Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hengyuan MaDepartment of Digital Technology Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hao QuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Danying WangDepartment of Scar and Wound Treatment Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
XiaoLei JinDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33# Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China.
Xiaojun TangDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 33# Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China. frog30@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-0841

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82100983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParanasal concavity, particularly prevalent in East Asian females, contributes to a prematurely aged facial profile. The paranasal augmentation with customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants offers an effective solution for this aesthetic concern. However, conventional design strategies often encounter challenges in bridging the knowledge gap between surgical requirements and engineering implementation, which may result in unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes. The optimized interdisciplinary approach is required to integrate clinical and engineering expertise. Therefore, the present study aims to introduce a novel design strategy for customized PEEK implants in paranasal augmentation and to investigate clinical outcomes.

methodsThe present study enrolled 36 consecutive female patients with bilateral paranasal concavity. A surgeon-engineer collaboration workflow was established. The placement position, size, thickness, screw channel, and surface morphology of the implant were the key factors for implant design. Perioperative medical data were meticulously collected and analyzed. The outcomes were evaluated by objective quantitative measurements (maximum concavity depth of paranasal region, nasolabial angle, alar base width, nasorostral angle, philtrum length, and nasal columella length), and subjective questionnaire focused on satisfaction and design experience.

resultsThe mean operative duration was 55.28 ± 10.89 minutes with minimal intraoperative blood loss. The most common complication was transient perioral numbness. The wound nonunion and infection were not observed in all patients at final follow-up. Quantitative analysis demonstrated significant improvements in paranasal region: maximum concavity depth decreased from 5.45 ± 0.68 to 1.64 ± 0.53 mm (right side, p<0.001) and from 5.62 ± 0.70 to 1.53 ± 0.64 mm (left side, p<0.001). The nasolabial angle demonstrated a statistically significant increase from 90.49 ± 4.53° preoperatively to 95.33 ± 4.75° at final follow-up (p < 0.001). The subjective outcomes of patients revealed 83.33% satisfaction with aesthetic improvement and 72.22% enhanced self-confidence. A significant proportion of patients expressed high satisfaction with the design process for customized PEEK implants.

conclusionsThe novel design strategy through surgeon-engineer collaboration for customized PEEK implants demonstrated remarkable efficacy in paranasal concavity correction, achieving satisfactory aesthetic enhancement. The interdisciplinary approach highlights the critical integration of clinical expertise with engineering precision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

KetonesPolyethylene GlycolsProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis DesignRhinoplastyAdultBenzophenonesCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPolymersRetrospective StudiesBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersFacial aestheticsInterdisciplinary collaborationNasal base concavityParanasal augmentationPolyetheretherketone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.