ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Revisiting meniscal anatomical variants of the knee: a high-resolution 7-Tesla MRI study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardized MRI nomenclature for knee meniscal lesions: SSR consensus panel report.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo examine anatomical variants of meniscal root insertions among asymptomatic individuals using high-resolution 7-T MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis prospective study, approved by the local ethics committee, involved 57 knees from 48 participants (mean age 31.8 years; 19 females), being examined on a clinical 7-T MRI scanner with sagittal isotropic 0.24 mm 3D double echo steady state (DESS) sequence. Two radiologists identified the number and location of each meniscal root insertion. Two other radiologists repeated this evaluation, noting meniscofemoral ligaments. Inter-rater reliability was calculated.
resultsMajority of the posterior lateral meniscus roots featured double insertions (66.7%), followed by single (31.6%) and triple insertions (1.8%). Single roots mainly inserted into the intercondylar area (77.8%), the remaining into the posterior slope of the posteromedial eminence (22.2%). Double roots typically had a major insertion at the posteromedial aspect of the anterior cruciate ligament and a minor root at the posterior slope of the lateral eminence (78.9%). The remaining roots of both menisci featured only single insertions. Anterior medial roots inserted along the medial tibial edge (71.9%) and into the intercondylar area (28.1%). Inter-rater reliability for describing the posterior lateral meniscal root insertions was perfect (κ = 1), and strong for identifying all insertion sites (κ = 0.808). Meniscofemoral ligaments were prevalent (87.7%) with a broad heterogenous fan-shaped femoral attachment observed using the 3D DESS sequence.
conclusion7-T 3D-DESS imaging allows high-resolution visualization of the meniscal roots with excellent inter-rater reliability, highlighting anatomical variability mainly in the posterior root of the lateral meniscus. KEY POINTS: Question Anatomical variations of the number and insertion sites of meniscal roots are documented in anatomical and imaging studies. Findings High-resolution 3D dual-echo steady state on a 7-T MRI facilitates the visualization of the number of roots and their respective osseous insertions for both menisci. Clinical relevance The menisci demonstrate considerable variability in both root number and their insertion locations, particularly the posterior lateral meniscus exhibits up to three root insertions. Understanding anatomical variants is crucial for the accurate interpretation and reporting of knee imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.