Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162664›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

MATCH: A toolbox to assess the primary color of real-world objects and generate color-matching stimuli.

Jessica N Goetz, Mark B Neider

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica N GoetzDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg 99 Ste. 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-1390, USA. jessica.goetz@ucf.edu.
Mark B NeiderDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg 99 Ste. 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-1390, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world stimuli can be difficult to manipulate and control in experimental psychology studies. Color information is frequently used as a variable, and researchers often rely on subjective color labels that imprecisely describe the color information within real-world objects. Here, we describe a new toolbox called MATCH (Matching And Transforming Closely Hued objects) that can easily and objectively quantify and manipulate color information within real-world objects to generate object pairs that match in color. MATCH was designed incorporating theoretical frameworks and conceptual understanding from visual cognition research. Additionally, MATCH provides critical information on the distribution of color and the specific color values of any stimulus set. We also present two experimental studies to validate whether MATCH produces images that are consistent with human visual perception. In the first study, we provide evidence that the stimuli generated by MATCH are perceptually closer in color to a reference object compared to human categorization of object-color pairs. In the second study, we investigated the search for real-world objects with distractors generated by MATCH that matched the target object's color. We found patterns of data that are consistent with current theories of human search behavior. In summary, MATCH allows researchers to carefully control the color of real-world stimuli used in their studies.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionAdultColorFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationYoung AdultColorImage processingStimulus generation

Identifiers

PMID41162664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.