Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162637›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2026

Rim enhancement on imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of biological and prognostic values.

Matteo Renzulli, Alessandro Cucchetti, Valentina Zucchini, Valentina Ciaravino, Cecilia Binda, Cristina Mosconi, Giorgio Ercolani, Emanuela Giampalma

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matteo Renzulli *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. matteo.renzulli@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-5670
Alessandro Cucchetti *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1964
Valentina ZucchiniMorgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-8824
Valentina CiaravinoMorgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-0173
Cecilia BindaMorgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-9684
Cristina MosconiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6822-9053
Giorgio ErcolaniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4334-5167
Emanuela GiampalmaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1455-6971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive malignancies, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging provides valuable non-invasive information on tumor biology, and rim enhancement (RE) on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a potential biomarker of aggressive disease. To clarify its clinical significance, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up to May 31st, 2025, in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Twelve studies (10 retrospective, 2 prospective) including 2207 patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of RE was 36.3%, with a good inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.808). RE was consistently associated with reduced resectability (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19-5.12, p < 0.001), poorer histological differentiation (OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.05-17.07, p = 0.043), and increased frequency of SMAD4 (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.60, p = 0.003) and KRAS mutations (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.37-4.75, p = 0.003). Patients with RE also experienced shorter progression-free, disease-free, and overall survival after both surgical and non-surgical treatments (all p < 0.001). These findings indicate that RE is a reproducible imaging marker of aggressive tumor biology in PDAC, reflecting unfavorable pathological and molecular features and serving as a predictor of resectability and survival.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaHumansPrognosisContrast MediaComputed tomographyMagnetic resonanceMeta-analysisPancreatic cancerPancreatic neoplasmsRim enhancement

Identifiers

PMID41162637
PMCPMC12932284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.