SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2026
Rim enhancement on imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of biological and prognostic values.
Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive malignancies, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging provides valuable non-invasive information on tumor biology, and rim enhancement (RE) on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a potential biomarker of aggressive disease. To clarify its clinical significance, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up to May 31st, 2025, in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Twelve studies (10 retrospective, 2 prospective) including 2207 patients were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of RE was 36.3%, with a good inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.808). RE was consistently associated with reduced resectability (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19-5.12, p < 0.001), poorer histological differentiation (OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.05-17.07, p = 0.043), and increased frequency of SMAD4 (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.60, p = 0.003) and KRAS mutations (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.37-4.75, p = 0.003). Patients with RE also experienced shorter progression-free, disease-free, and overall survival after both surgical and non-surgical treatments (all p < 0.001). These findings indicate that RE is a reproducible imaging marker of aggressive tumor biology in PDAC, reflecting unfavorable pathological and molecular features and serving as a predictor of resectability and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.