ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterising protective immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in urban and rural Malawi between February 2021 and April 2022.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reduced COVID-19 severity in Africa: a systematic review of host genetic and immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody profiles reveal variant specific antibody dynamics and regional differences in infection histories in Malawi.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Malawi remains unclear due to high proportions of mild/asymptomatic infections and limited diagnostics. Existing seroprevalence studies in Malawi have primarily used convenience samples and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We assessed SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation in a longitudinal Malawian population-based cohort, assessing protective immunity post-infection and vaccination. Sera were obtained from rural (Karonga, n = 958) and urban (Lilongwe, n = 918) based participants at three-monthly intervals (February 2021-April 2022). Neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using human immunodeficiency (HIV)-based pseudotype assays in HIV-uninfected participants, and vesicular stomatitis virus-based assays in HIV-infected participants and an HIV-uninfected subset. Nucleocapsid ELISAs identified vaccinated participants also infected. SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation profiles increased in complexity over time from rising vaccination coverage and emerging variants. Neutralising antibody prevalence was higher in Lilongwe than Karonga (68.1% (CI 63.5-72.4) vs. 45.4% (CI 41.6-49.3), Survey 4). Hybrid immune and solely vaccinated participants exhibited higher titres than those solely infected. Children < 15 years had the lowest neutralising antibody titres among infected (not vaccinated) participants. People living with HIV had lower neutralising responses than those HIV-uninfected, particularly post vaccination. We therefore recommend surveillance of children and people living with HIV as low neutralisation responses increase reinfection risk. COVID-19 vaccination should be prioritised for HIV-infected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.