Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Competing effect of activity and non-inert crowding on the dynamics of self-propelled tracer particles.

Baburao Simma, Vrinda Garg, Radha Ramana, Amit Ranjan Maity, Surya K Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Baburao SimmaDepartment of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, 506004, India.
Vrinda GargDepartment of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, 506004, India.
Radha RamanaDepartment of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, 506004, India.
Amit Ranjan MaityAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata, 700135, India.
Surya K GhoshDepartment of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, 506004, India. skghosh@nitw.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transport of single molecules via passive or active processes is crucial for biological functioning. In this study, we investigate the dynamics of point-like self-propelled tracer particles in a non-inert, ordered crowded environment using underdamped Langevin dynamics. The crowders are modeled by creating a biologically relevant setting with high damping and attractive centers. We analyze the diffusion of passive and self-propelled tracers as a function of crowder stickiness and packing fraction. Passive tracers exhibit subdiffusive behavior, while self-propelled tracers show superdiffusion despite obstruction by crowders. At intermediate packing fractions, diffusion is suppressed due to perfectly separated attractive centers, an effect overcome by active propulsion, which enhances tracer mobility. In extreme crowding situations, the attractive potential valleys start to overlap, contributing to enhanced diffusion. The displacement probability distribution of passive tracers is non-Gaussian at intermediate packing fractions, displaying a double-Gaussian structure. This non-Gaussianity is reduced for active tracers, whose distributions exhibit soft multi-step features arising from repeated hopping and trapping events. Furthermore, propulsion restores ergodicity, which is otherwise broken due to the presence of sticky crowders.

Indexed as

Anomalous diffusionErgodicity breakingLangevin dynamicsOrdered crowdingSelf-propelled particlevan-Hove correlation

Identifiers

PMID41162521
PMCPMC12572408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.