ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning-based dual-branch framework for automated skin lesion segmentation and classification via dermoscopic Images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modelling of hybrid deep ensemble learning based skin lesion detection using FCNN denoising and inception-dilated ResNetV2.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Foundation Learning for Robust and Data-Efficient Skin Disease Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimized High- Resolution Network for Accurate Facial Wrinkle Detection Using Harbor Seal Whiskers Optimization.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- An optimized EfficientNetB7 deep learning model for lung cancer tissue pathology image recognition.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Scalable HMO-CNN-SVM Framework for Skin Lesion Classification: A Metaheuristic-Driven Approach With Parallelizable Optimization for Cluster Deployment.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early skin disease detection significantly improves patient survival rates, yet limited access to dermatological expertise creates an urgent need for automated diagnostic systems. In this paper, we develop a dual-branch deep learning framework that simultaneously performs skin lesion segmentation and classification from dermoscopic images. The proposed segmentation branch uses a modified EfficientNet-B7 encoder with Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) for multi-scale feature extraction and transformer blocks for global context modeling. Attention gates and Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks enhance feature selection and boundary precision. The classification branch fuses DenseNet-121 visual features with morphological characteristics extracted from predicted segmentation masks, creating a hybrid appearance-morphology analysis approach. The proposed framework achieved strong and consistent segmentation performance across five benchmark datasets. On HAM10000, the highest Dice score (0.9568) and IoU (0.9242) were recorded, with an accuracy of 0.9708. PH2 achieved a Dice of 0.9250 and a sensitivity of 0.9734, while ISIC 2016 reached a Dice of 0.9298 and an IoU of 0.8811. For ISIC 2017 and ISIC 2018, Dice scores were 0.8972 and 0.9020, respectively. All datasets reported high specificity (> 0.93) and accuracy (> 0.95), confirming the model's robustness and generalization capability. Our dual-branch framework achieves state-of-the-art accuracy by effectively integrating visual appearance and structural morphological features for comprehensive skin lesion analysis. The consistent high performance across diverse datasets indicates strong potential for clinical deployment as a diagnostic support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.