Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162500›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Rasch analysis and differential item functioning of the marital happiness scale in Oman.

Ehab M N Omara, Mustafa Ali Khalaf, Manal Khasib Al Fazari, Mahmood Salim Almaawali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ehab M N OmaraPsychology Department, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman.
Mustafa Ali KhalafPsychology Department, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman. m.ali@squ.edu.om.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-6541
Manal Khasib Al FazariPsychology Department, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman.
Mahmood Salim AlmaawaliPsychology Department, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marital happiness is an important variable in family life in Oman as a coherent Muslim society. Recent societal attention to marital happiness and divorce rates in Oman underpins the need for a valid and reliable instrument to precisely measure the levels of marital happiness among Omani spouses. However, a close look at the measurement of marital happiness reveals the scarcity of reliable and valid instruments developed using item response theory assumption. To this end, we used data from a nationally representative sample of Omani couples to develop and validate the marital happiness scale in light of the Rasch rating scale model. Using Winsteps software version 3.80.1 ( https://www.winsteps.com/index.htm ), we examined unidimensionality, rating scale functioning, item infit and outfit statistics, item polarity, reliability and separation indices of items and persons, the item hierarchy, and DIF across genders. The findings indicated that marital happiness is a single unidimensional construct and that the scale has adequate psychometric properties in Oman despite the existence of DIF in certain items. Limitations and further research topics concerning cross-cultural validation of the scale and qualitative refinement of the items showing DIF were discussed.

Indexed as

HappinessMarriagePsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmanReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDIFMarital happinessOmani couplesRasch analysisScale developmentScale validation

Identifiers

PMID41162500
PMCPMC12572643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.