ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting motor rehabilitation outcomes in children with low vision: a nomogram-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Low Vision Rehabilitation Programs for Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatosensory technology offers an innovative approach for motor function rehabilitation in children with low vision. However, limited studies have explored the key factors influencing its effectiveness, and predictive models for clinical guidance are lacking. This study included 183 children with low vision who underwent somatosensory-based motor rehabilitation training from January 2021 to December 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 128) and a validation set (n = 55). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with rehabilitation outcomes. A nomogram prediction model was developed based on significant variables. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Rehabilitation was ineffective in 38 children (29.69%) in the training set and 15 children (27.27%) in the validation set. Independent risk factors for poor outcomes included long disease duration, low family support, presence of complications, low training intensity, poor baseline vision, and limited adaptability to somatosensory technology (P < 0.05). The nomogram showed excellent predictive performance, with C-index values of 0.935 and 0.841, and AUCs of 0.941 and 0.843 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. DCA demonstrated clinical utility across a wide range of threshold probabilities. The nomogram effectively predicts rehabilitation outcomes in children with low vision receiving somatosensory-based training. This tool can assist clinicians in developing individualized rehabilitation strategies and improving intervention effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.