ArticleScientific reports2025
Automating time
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated detection of calls is essential to bioacoustic research where it is routine to collect large data sets that preclude effective human annotation. Automated analysis remains challenging due to variations in calls, varying noise backgrounds, and limited annotation data. The recent emergence of very large foundation models has demonstrated exceptional zero-shot and few-shot generalization capabilities, often matching or surpassing specialized models that are fine-tuned for specific domains. We demonstrate that such models can be adapted to bioacoustic tasks. We adapt segment anything model (SAM), a foundational vision model designed for image segmentation, to detect toothed-whale whistle energy in a time-frequency representation of audio. We use an existing tracking algorithm to generate fine-grained time-frequency annotations from the detected whistle energy. The model, SAM-whistle, leverages SAM's pretrained vision transformer network as an encoder network that is adapted to generate spectrogram embeddings that capture information about whistles. The resultant embeddings are decoded using a convolutional decoder that produces time-frequency masks that indicate the presence of whistle energy. Individual whistle contours are produced from the time-frequency masks by the tracking algorithm. Comprehensive evaluations using a subset of the publicly available DCLDE 2011 analyst-annotated dolphin whistle dataset (7211 training whistles and 860 test whistles from common and bottlenose dolphins were used) demonstrate that SAM-whistle has strong performance, achieving an F1 score of 0.897 (precision 0.920, recall 0.876) and demonstrating consistency across a large range of detection thresholds. The model is effective at retrieving nearly complete whistle contours, producing annotations that typically cover 89% of analyst-annotated contours, and producing an expected 1.15 detections for each whistle, indicating that most whistles are not fragmented into multiple detections. Qualitative analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of SAM-whistle in capturing long-duration whistles and distinguishing unique acoustic patterns. These results highlight the potential of adapting foundation models for specialized bioacoustic analysis tasks, providing a scalable and efficient solution for the automated detection of wildlife vocalizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.