Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162419›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Combining deep learning and microfluidics for fast and noninvasive sorting of zebrafish embryo.

Alioune Diouf, Ferhat Sadak, Leandre Bereziat, Edison Gerena, Florian Fage, Abdelkrim Mannioui, Daniela Zizioli, Irene Fassi, Mokrane Boudaoud, Giovanni Legnani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alioune DioufSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France. diouf@isir.upmc.fr.
Ferhat SadakBartin University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bartin, 74110, Türkiye.
Leandre BereziatSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France.
Edison GerenaSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France.
Florian FageSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France.
Abdelkrim ManniouiSorbonne Université, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Paris, France.
Daniela ZizioliUniversita degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Brescia, Italy.
Irene FassiInstitute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing National Research Council of Italy, Milan, Italy.
Mokrane BoudaoudSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France.
Giovanni LegnaniUniversita degli Studi di Brescia, Department of Industrial Engineering, Brescia, Italy.
Sinan HaliyoSorbonne Université, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Paris, 75005, France.

Funding

Republic of Turkey Strategy and Budget Presidency 2021K12-169131/12.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorting of zebrafish embryos remains a challenging task in biomedical research. There is a need for accurate and efficient methods to distinguish between embryos at Stage 1, the zygote period immediately after fertilization, characterized by the single-cell stage, as well as those at advanced developmental stages (above single-cell stage) and non-viable (Dead) embryos. Manual sorting is labor-intensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. Traditional automated techniques, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and robotic systems, are often invasive or prohibitively expensive, limiting their accessibility and scalability for routine zebrafish embryo sorting. This paper presents a novel approach that integrates deep learning with microfluidic technology to address these limitations. Our system utilizes a YOLOv8-based deep learning model for real-time embryo classification, whereas a microfluidic chip which is equipped with peristaltic pumps, ensures precise sorting with minimal manual intervention. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed to optimise the flow parameters, and experimental validation demonstrate the system’s high accuracy and sorting efficiency. The YOLOv8 model demonstrate a detection accuracy of 97.6 % and a processing speed of 10.5 ms. The sorting experiments demonstrate the system’s efficacy, with the Stage 1 class achieving a detection accuracy of 90.63 % and a sorting efficiency of 88.13 %. The Advanced class exhibited enhanced performance, with a detection accuracy of 93.36 % and a sorting efficiency of 91.80 %. The Dead class demonstrate the highest performance, with a detection accuracy of 99.03 % and a sorting efficiency of 96.60 %. The system demonstrate an average sorting rate of 2.92 s per embryo. This approach provides a reliable, cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, significantly improving the speed and precision of embryo sorting.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEmbryo, NonmammalianMicrofluidicsZebrafishAnimalsFlow Cytometry

Identifiers

PMID41162419
PMCPMC12572247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.