ArticleScientific reports2025
Combining deep learning and microfluidics for fast and noninvasive sorting of zebrafish embryo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering monosex and sterile fish for food production: from conventional methods to CRISPR-based precision.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
- Automated Embryo Sorting in Zebrafish Facilities: Performance Benchmarking Against Manual Processing.Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sorting of zebrafish embryos remains a challenging task in biomedical research. There is a need for accurate and efficient methods to distinguish between embryos at Stage 1, the zygote period immediately after fertilization, characterized by the single-cell stage, as well as those at advanced developmental stages (above single-cell stage) and non-viable (Dead) embryos. Manual sorting is labor-intensive, error-prone, and time-consuming. Traditional automated techniques, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and robotic systems, are often invasive or prohibitively expensive, limiting their accessibility and scalability for routine zebrafish embryo sorting. This paper presents a novel approach that integrates deep learning with microfluidic technology to address these limitations. Our system utilizes a YOLOv8-based deep learning model for real-time embryo classification, whereas a microfluidic chip which is equipped with peristaltic pumps, ensures precise sorting with minimal manual intervention. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed to optimise the flow parameters, and experimental validation demonstrate the system’s high accuracy and sorting efficiency. The YOLOv8 model demonstrate a detection accuracy of 97.6 % and a processing speed of 10.5 ms. The sorting experiments demonstrate the system’s efficacy, with the Stage 1 class achieving a detection accuracy of 90.63 % and a sorting efficiency of 88.13 %. The Advanced class exhibited enhanced performance, with a detection accuracy of 93.36 % and a sorting efficiency of 91.80 %. The Dead class demonstrate the highest performance, with a detection accuracy of 99.03 % and a sorting efficiency of 96.60 %. The system demonstrate an average sorting rate of 2.92 s per embryo. This approach provides a reliable, cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, significantly improving the speed and precision of embryo sorting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.