Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162414›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A Global Dataset of Location Data Integrity-Assessed Reforestation Efforts.

Angela John, Selvyn Allotey, Till Koebe, Alexandra Tyukavina, Ingmar Weber

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela JohnSaarland Informatics Campus, Department of Computer Science, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany. ajohn@cs.uni-saarland.de.ORCID 0009-0002-5323-6095
Selvyn AlloteySaarland Informatics Campus, Department of Computer Science, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.
Till KoebeSaarland Informatics Campus, Department of Computer Science, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5635-8878
Alexandra TyukavinaUniversity of Maryland, Department of Geographical Sciences, Riverdale, 20737, USA.
Ingmar WeberSaarland Informatics Campus, Department of Computer Science, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-2579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afforestation and reforestation are popular strategies for mitigating climate change by enhancing carbon sequestration. However, the effectiveness of these efforts is often self-reported by project developers, or certified through processes with limited external validation. This leads to concerns about data reliability and project integrity. In response to increasing scrutiny of voluntary carbon markets, this study presents a dataset on global afforestation and reforestation efforts compiled from primary (meta-)information and augmented with time-series satellite imagery and other secondary data. Our dataset covers 1,289,068 planting sites from 45,628 projects spanning 33 years. Since any remote sensing-based validation effort relies on the integrity of a planting site's geographic boundary, this dataset introduces a standardized assessment of the provided site-level location information, which we summarize in one easy-to-communicate key indicator: LDIS - the Location Data Integrity Score. We find that approximately 79% of the georeferenced planting sites monitored fail on at least 1 out of 10 LDIS indicators, while 15% of the monitored projects lack machine-readable georeferenced data in the first place. In addition to enhancing accountability in the voluntary carbon market, the presented dataset also holds value as training data for e.g. computer vision-related tasks with millions of linked Sentinel-2 satellite images.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestsCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeSatellite Imagery

Identifiers

PMID41162414
PMCPMC12572290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.