Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41162224›Full record

Observational studyClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2026

Early and Sustained Asthma Control and Remission in Real-World Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Benralizumab: XALOC-2.

Erika Penz, Thomas Rothe, Lieven Dupont, Trung N Tran, Andrew Menzies-Gow, Anat Shavit, David Cohen, Tanja Plate, Sheena Kayaniyil, An Herreman and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Response to benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Erika PenzUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-8450
Thomas RotheCantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Lieven DupontUniversity Hospital of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-1522
Trung N TranAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8003-7601
Andrew Menzies-GowAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-4986
Anat ShavitAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9898-907X
David CohenAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Tanja PlateAstraZeneca, Wedel, Germany.
Sheena KayaniyilAstraZeneca, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-9580
An HerremanAstraZeneca, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium.
Claudio SchuolerAstraZeneca, Baar, Switzerland.
Benjamin EmmanuelAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-9826
Marek LommatzschUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-9348

Funding

AstraZeneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProspective real-world data concerning the early and sustained effects of benralizumab on asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is lacking.

methodsXALOC-2 is a prospective, observational, multi-national, real-world study in adults with SEA treated with benralizumab. This integrated analysis assessed Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores, achievement of 3-component clinical remission (which included well-controlled symptoms [ACQ score ≤ 0.75], no exacerbations, and no use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), and other clinical outcomes, over a 12-month baseline period and up to Week 56. Associations between remission status and key baseline characteristics were also assessed.

results535 patients were included. Median (interquartile range) ACQ score at baseline was 3.0 (2.2-3.8). At Week 1, 58.0% (282/486) of patients had ACQ score reductions of ≥ 0.5 points (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) and 35.0% (170/486) had reductions of ≥ 1 point (2× MCID). By Week 56, these increased to 78.6% (276/351) and 62.1% (218/351), respectively. Improved asthma control after benralizumab initiation was similar irrespective of previous biologic use status. By Week 56, clinical remission criteria were achieved in 26.7% (70/262) of patients versus 0% (0/374) at baseline. No mOCS use, lower body mass index, better asthma symptom control and higher peak blood eosinophil count at baseline were associated with meeting 3-component clinical remission criteria at Week 56.

conclusionsReal-world patients receiving benralizumab showed early and sustained improvements in asthma symptoms, regardless of previous biologic use. More than a quarter of patients achieved clinical asthma remission after 1 year of benralizumab treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaAdultAgedEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedbenralizumabasthma controlbenralizumabclinical remissioneosinophilssevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID41162224
PMCPMC13006152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.