Trial reportScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Improved diagnostic management of children with acute infections following the introduction of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing and general practitioner education in Latvia: a
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn order to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, diagnostic processes require improvement for children in primary care.
design
settingEighty general practitioner (GP) practices throughout Latvia.
interventionIn the first study period, one GP group received combined interventions (access to CRP POCT and GP education), while the second GP group continued usual care (control group). In the second study period, the GP groups were switched - previous control group received combined intervention, but previous intervention group re-established usual care, but the long-term education effect was evaluated in this group. SUBJECTS: Children with acute infections consulted by a GP. MAIN OUTCOME: Impact of combined intervention and long-term education on testing level (CRP, full blood count, Strep A test, influenza test, urinalysis and X-ray) before antibiotic prescribing. Patient- and GPs- related predictors (including practice location and access to laboratory services) of diagnostic testing were also analysed. Secondary outcome was antibiotic prescribing according to the test results.
resultsDiagnostic testing was significantly increased in the combined intervention group versus the usual care group (aOR 11.1, 95% CI 8.0-15.3); however, it was decreased in the long-term education group (26.4%) (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8). Rural practices and a longer expected time of laboratory results were associated with a more pronounced increase in diagnostic testing in the combined intervention group (aOR 37.6, 95% CI 17.9-79.0; aOR 23.2, 95% CI 14.1-38.0, respectively). It was found that a low CRP value, negative Strep A test or normal X-ray often did not convince GPs to withhold antibiotics.
conclusionThe availability of CRP POCT and GP education results in a much higher level of diagnostic testing prior to antibiotic prescribing, especially in rural regions. Further improvements in more rational testing and the interpretation of results to guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.