Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41161944›Full record

ReviewInternational review of neurobiology2025

Clinical neuroscience and neurobiology of placebo and nocebo effects.

Nandini Raghuraman, Luana Colloca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nandini RaghuramanDepartment of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States; Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, United States. Electronic address: nraghuraman@umaryland.edu.
Luana CollocaDepartment of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States; Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, United States; Department of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States. Electronic address: colloca@umaryland.edu.

Funding

Neural correlates of hypoalgesia driven by observationR01AT010333 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Neural Mechanisms of Immersive Virtual Reality in Chronic PainR01AT011347 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Luana Colloca · 2021 to 2026
$3.2M
Chronic orofacial pain: genetics, cognitive-emotional factors, and endogenous modulatory systemsR01DE025946 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
Secondary Analysis and Integration of Existing Data Related to Chronic Orofacial Pain and Placebo Effects - Administrative SupplementR21DE032532 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA, DORSEY, SUSAN G · 2022 to 2023
$513k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010333NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT011347NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025946NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE032532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placebo effects refer to changes in outcomes driven by learning and expectations, and they can shape responses to both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. This chapter examines the neurobiology of placebo and nocebo effects, with an emphasis on findings from human research. Drawing primarily from controlled laboratory studies, we highlight neuroimaging and transcriptomic mechanisms that shed light on the formation of placebo and nocebo responses. In particular, this chapter highlights how expectations and contextual cues can enhance or diminish the efficacy of both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. A focus is placed on the role of open-label, cost perception, branding, and treatment modality in modulating placebo effects. The neurochemical basis of placebo analgesia is also examined, with a central role identified for endogenous opioids, and additional contributions from the endocannabinoid and dopaminergic systems. Neuroimaging studies reveal brain networks and structural markers that predict placebo responsiveness. Genetic and transcriptomic insights add a molecular layer to this understanding as well as RNA expression profiles, helping to identify placebo responders. Finally, the chapter emphasizes the clinical relevance of nocebo effects, detailing how negative expectations and communication can worsen outcomes. We also discuss the clinical relevance of these mechanisms, particularly in rheumatology, where both functional and structural brain changes have been observed. It advocates for improved communication strategies, personalized consent, and ethical integration of placebo science to optimize pain care and clinical trial designs. Future research should focus on translating individual variability in placebo and nocebo effects into strategies for advancing personalized and precision medicine.

Indexed as

BrainNeurobiologyNeurosciencesNocebo EffectPainPlacebo EffectHumansBrain imagingConditioningExpectationsOmicsOxytocinVasopressin

Identifiers

PMID41161944
PMCPMC13088095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.