ReviewInternational review of neurobiology2025
Clinical neuroscience and neurobiology of placebo and nocebo effects.
Review in International review of neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Placebo effects refer to changes in outcomes driven by learning and expectations, and they can shape responses to both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. This chapter examines the neurobiology of placebo and nocebo effects, with an emphasis on findings from human research. Drawing primarily from controlled laboratory studies, we highlight neuroimaging and transcriptomic mechanisms that shed light on the formation of placebo and nocebo responses. In particular, this chapter highlights how expectations and contextual cues can enhance or diminish the efficacy of both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. A focus is placed on the role of open-label, cost perception, branding, and treatment modality in modulating placebo effects. The neurochemical basis of placebo analgesia is also examined, with a central role identified for endogenous opioids, and additional contributions from the endocannabinoid and dopaminergic systems. Neuroimaging studies reveal brain networks and structural markers that predict placebo responsiveness. Genetic and transcriptomic insights add a molecular layer to this understanding as well as RNA expression profiles, helping to identify placebo responders. Finally, the chapter emphasizes the clinical relevance of nocebo effects, detailing how negative expectations and communication can worsen outcomes. We also discuss the clinical relevance of these mechanisms, particularly in rheumatology, where both functional and structural brain changes have been observed. It advocates for improved communication strategies, personalized consent, and ethical integration of placebo science to optimize pain care and clinical trial designs. Future research should focus on translating individual variability in placebo and nocebo effects into strategies for advancing personalized and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.