ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
Quantitative MR Imaging of the Breast.
Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast MRI has become essential for diagnosing and managing breast diseases. MRI interpretation has traditionally relied on subjective assessment according to Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System, but recent advances emphasize the value of quantitative MRI data as objective imaging biomarkers. Techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), including ultrafast DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging are the most established for quantitative analysis, yet their routine application is limited by a lack of standardization in imaging protocols. Recent efforts focus on improving reproducibility, with studies showing that significant changes in the apparent diffusion coefficient can reliably indicate biological alterations in breast lesions. Emerging quantitative MRI approaches including synthetic MRI and fat imaging show promise in lesion characterization and treatment response assessment but require further validation and harmonization before widespread clinical use. For methodological aspect, radiomics has demonstrated strong diagnostic and predictive capabilities in breast MRI research. Quantitative approach for background parenchymal enhancement indicated its association with future breast cancer incidence or recurrence. Continued efforts to standardize and validate quantitative MRI parameters are crucial to fully integrating these tools into routine breast imaging practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.