Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41161673›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025

Stressing the System: Biomechanics of Sequential Swallowing in Healthy Adults.

Anna Miles, Kendrea L Focht Garand, Shakeela Saleem, Kevin Renz Ambrocio, Jacqueline Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna MilesThe University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-5824
Kendrea L Focht GarandDepartment of Speech Pathology & Audiology, University of South Alabama, Mobile.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-4398
Shakeela SaleemThe University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Kevin Renz AmbrocioDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4596-2898
Jacqueline AllenThe University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Research and Mentoring on Swallowing Impairment and Respiratory-Swallow CoordinatK24DC012801 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN-HARRIS, BONNIE J · 2013 to 2024
$1.8M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)TL1TR000061 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$483k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000061NIDCD NIH HHS K24 DC012801RRD VA IK1 RX001628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSequential drinking of multiple liquid swallows requires sustained airway protection. Volume swallowed and speed of delivery may be altered by instruction and delivery method, for example, open cup versus straw drinking. Our clinical purpose was to explore the optimal method for "stressing the system" in a swallow assessment to provide the most useful information possible. This study investigated how task affected sequential drinking biomechanics.

methodVideofluoroscopic swallow studies of 318 healthy adults (20-99 years) were analyzed: 179 adults drank barium liquid from a 90-ml open cup with the instruction "drink this as you normally would" and 139 drank 100 ml of barium liquid via a straw with the instruction "finish the cup as quickly as possible." Timing and displacement measures were taken. Hyolaryngeal complex (HLC) behavior was classified into four types: HLC-I, reopening of laryngeal vestibule between swallows while HLC still elevated; HLC-II, sustained complete laryngeal vestibule closure; HLC-III mixed sequential (mix of HLC-I and II); or HLC-IV discrete swallows wherein HLC returns to resting position between swallows.

resultsAll HLC patterns were observed across participants: HLC-I (cup: 23%; straw 22%), HLC-II (cup: 23%; straw 31%), HLC-III (cup: 3%; straw 23%), or HLC-IV (cup: 51%; straw 24%). Straw drinking was significantly more likely to elicit sequential swallows compared to cup drinking, which resulted in greater sustained airway closure. Age was not significantly associated with HLC pattern. There were significant differences in timing and displacement measures between cup- and straw-drinking tasks and across HLC patterns.

conclusionsStraw drinking with the instruction "finish the cup as quickly as possible" elicited sequential swallows more often than cup drinking with greater sustained airway closure. It also provided greater opportunity to view pharyngeal capability and airway protection ability and may represent a more challenging airway swallow pattern.

Indexed as

DeglutitionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaDrinkingFemaleFluoroscopyHumansLarynxMaleMiddle AgedPharynxVideo RecordingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41161673
PMCPMC12704915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.