ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2026
Convergence Insufficiency After Bilateral Medial Rectus Recession for Age-Related Distance Esotropia?
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated postoperative exophoria and symptoms of convergence insufficiency following bilateral medial rectus (MR) muscle recession performed for correction of age-related distance esotropia (ARDE).
designRetrospective case series.
methodsData were reviewed for patients with ARDE without neurological diseases who underwent bilateral MR recession between September 2014 and October 2024.
resultsIncluded were 110 patients of mean age 74 ± 9 (standard deviation) years. Preoperative esotropia was 13 ± 8∆ at distance and 4 ± 6∆ at near. Preoperative convergence fusional amplitude was 27 ± 12∆. Bilateral MR recession was combined with vertical rectus surgeries in 28 (25%) patients. At the final follow-up after a mean of 14 months, 8 (7%) patients exhibited exophoria at distance. Exophoria was present at near in 48 (44%) patients, including 8 in whom exophoria exceeded 10∆. However, none of these exophoric patients reported symptomatic diplopia or difficulty with near tasks at any time. At final follow-up, ARDE recurred in 22 patients (20%). Mean initial postoperative near deviation did not differ between groups (-2.0∆ vs -2.4∆, P = .77). However, at final follow-up, the nonrecurrence group had significantly more exophoria than the recurrence group (-2.5∆ vs -0.1∆, P = .02). Survival analysis demonstrated approximately 15% recurrence rate of ARDE 2.5 years after surgery, increasing at 5 years postoperatively to 40%.
conclusionsBilateral MR recession for ARDE is unlikely to cause convergence insufficiency, but long-term postoperative exophoria after this procedure may protect against late recurrence of ARDE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.