ArticleAcademic pediatrics2026
Feasibility of Large-Scale Development-Focused EEG Research in a Hospital-Based Primary Care Setting.
Article in Academic pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe age of diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder varies by sociodemographic factors, elevating the need for earlier, unbiased screening and diagnostic measures. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising biomarker for early autism detection, but feasibility and validation in primary care settings and in underserved populations remain underexplored. This study evaluates the feasibility of embedding longitudinal EEG and survey data collection into the primary care setting to address these care differences.
methodsBaby Steps is a longitudinal study being conducted in a hospital-based urban primary care clinic serving predominantly low-income families. Infants were recruited prior to their 4-month well-child visits, with EEG and parent surveys collected at 4-, 9-, and 12-month visits. Data collection was integrated into the clinic workflow to minimize disruption. Feasibility was assessed based on the first 250 participants enrolled through metrics of recruitment, retention, and data quality, with bivariate analyses examining predictors of retention.
resultsTo reach 250 enrolled participants, 856 eligible families were approached for recruitment. Enrollment reflected clinic demographics (53% Hispanic/Latina/e, 36% Black), and 64% were publicly insured. Around 94% of participants were retained through 12 months. EEG data were collected at 2 or more time points for 87% of participants. Full survey completion ranged from 65% to 78% at each time point. No sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with completion of surveys.
conclusionsEmbedding EEG research in primary care is feasible and facilitates the inclusion of underserved populations. This approach enhances research applicability and may serve as a model for similar efforts in pediatric research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.