SynthesisAcademic pediatrics
Interventions to Promote Pediatric Shared Decision-Making and Child Engagement in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically describe outcomes of child-, clinician-, and clinic-facing interventions to improve shared decision-making (SDM) and child engagement in primary care.
methodsA trained health services librarian searched 5 databases. Included studies collected primary data (observational or randomized control trials), assessed child-, clinician-, or clinic-facing interventions aimed at improving SDM and/or engagement-related outcomes for children ages 7 to 18, focused on conditions commonly treated in primary care, and were published between January 2014 and April 2024. Two authors screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and strength of evidence.
resultsSixteen studies met inclusion criteria. One study had a low level of bias and 15 had moderate levels. Interventions included single- or multisession trainings, coaching, communication guides, and integration into clinical flow. Eight were clinician-facing, 3 were clinician- and child-facing, 2 were child-facing, and 3 focused on clinic-level change. Nine included child-reported outcomes. Heterogeneous outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. However, interventions generally improved knowledge and information-sharing, with mixed or nonsignificant impact on patient-centered communication, participatory behaviors, self-efficacy, and validated SDM measures. Some negative outcomes were noted, such as clinician apprehension and decreased encounter efficiency. Based on the studies' outcomes, we generated an inductive conceptual model for factors that impact pediatric SDM and engagement in care.
conclusionsInterventions to promote SDM and engagement in pediatric primary care showed mixed but mostly positive results. Interventions were often not designed to interface with children directly. More systematic measurement of outcomes is needed to compare across studies. Future interventions should consider additional youth involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.