ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025
Pre- and post-move exposure to air pollution and neighborhood socioeconomic status.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNearly 10 % of the U.S. population moves in a given year. We aimed to examine differences in neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and ambient air pollution concentrations before and after a residential move, whether change varies by distance of the move, and whether moving is a potential source of bias in estimating relationships between contextual exposures and outcomes.
methodsWe used data from participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with geocoded addresses at Visit 2 (Visit 2; 1990-1992) and Visit 3 (Visit 3; 1993-1995). We quantified nSES using the 1990 census and estimated concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM
resultsOn average, compared to non-movers, short-distance movers relocated to neighborhoods with better nSES and similar air pollution concentrations, while long-distance movers relocated to neighborhoods with worse nSES but lower exposure to air pollution. The quantitative bias analysis suggested there was little to no bias in the PM
conclusionsChange in nSES and air pollution with a residential move differs by move distance. However, not accounting for relocation may not lead to significant bias in the relationship with the health outcome. Understanding the extent to which contextual exposures change after a move can clarify whether accounting for bias due to relocation is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.