Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2025
European Study of Prostate Cancer Screening - 23-Year Follow-up.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Early detection of urological malignancies in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.Familial cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Cancer detection in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).BJU international · 2026Trial
- Evaluating the Impact of Age on Prostate Cancer Overdiagnosis Using Long-Term Follow-Up From the CAP Randomised Trial.International journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- [Feasibility and clinical value of a prostate cancer screening model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen in a Chinese population].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Trial
- Article
- Prostate cancer screening: weighing the benefits and harms.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Structured micro-ultrasonography training improves prostate cancer detection and management decisions.BJU international · 2026Article
- Unified genetic risk score for prostate cancer enables improved risk stratification for clinical decision-making.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Systematic versus perilesional sampling in transperineal MRI-fusion biopsy: is perilesional sampling ready for prime time? A high-volume center analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men not Attending a Population-based Screening Program: The 'Good', the 'Bad', and the 'Ugly' After 20-yr Follow-up in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Sex hormone balance and PSA-derived biomarkers in cancer-free African migrant men in Italy: Implications for prostate cancer early detection.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- European Cancer Prevention Organization on cancer screening: an expert panel position paper.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026Article
- Implementation and First Results of the Czech Nationwide Prostate Cancer Screening Pilot Program.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Application of PathoChip to urine-derived nucleic acids for broad microbial profiling in men with suspected prostate cancer: setup of a methodological workflow and pilot feasibility study.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Mapping the readiness landscape for prostate cancer screening in Europe: analysis of health system capacity across the PRAISE-U pilots.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Evolving role of biomarkers beyond prostate‑specific antigen in refining prostate cancer screening: From blood‑based tests to urinary and genetic markers (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Prospective validation of a urine-based proteomics test for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Plasmonic Nanoarray Biosensors for Non-Invasive Cancer Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Context-aware monitoring: rethinking comprehensive screening in the era of AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) was initiated in 1993 to assess the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on prostate cancer mortality. Because deaths from prostate cancer are expected to rise worldwide owing to increased life expectancy and population growth, a final analysis of the long-term outcomes of prostate cancer screening is essential to understanding the benefits and harms of PSA testing.
methodsWe updated the findings from ERSPC, a multicenter, randomized study conducted across eight European countries with a focus on a predefined core age group of 162,236 men who were 55 to 69 years of age at the time of randomization. Participants were randomly assigned to the screening group and offered repeated PSA testing or to the control group and not invited for screening. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality.
resultsAfter a median follow-up of 23 years, prostate cancer mortality was 13% lower in the screening group (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.95), and the absolute risk reduction was 0.22% (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.34). The cumulative incidence of prostate cancer was higher in the screening group than in the control group (rate ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.33). At a median of 23 years of follow-up, one death from prostate cancer was prevented for every 456 men (95% CI, 306 to 943) who were invited for screening, and one death from prostate cancer was averted for every 12 men (95% CI, 8 to 26) in whom prostate cancer was diagnosed, as compared with one death from prostate cancer prevented for every 628 men (95% CI, 419 to 1481) and one death averted for every 18 men (95% CI, 12 to 45) at 16 years of follow-up.
conclusionsLong-term follow-up confirms a sustained reduction in deaths from prostate cancer with PSA testing, alongside an improved harm-benefit ratio. Future screening strategies should adopt risk-based approaches to minimize overdiagnosis while maintaining clinical benefits. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society and others; ERSPC ISRCTN registry number, ISRCTN49127736.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.