ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Transferable and Transparent Energy Decomposition-Based Machine Learning Models for Computing Accurate Reaction Energetics.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a transferable, interpretable, and modular machine-learning framework that enhances the accuracy of density functional theory (DFT) reaction energies using physically meaningful energy-decomposition descriptors. Reaction energies computed at the DFT level with standard basis sets are first decomposed into chemically intuitive contributions─such as kinetic and potential energy─which are then used to train a library of linear regression (LR) models. This includes a general-purpose model that reduces mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) relative to gold standard CCSD(T)/CBS reference values by up to 63% compared to uncorrected DFT across extended benchmark sets. In parallel, a series of specialized LR models provide improved accuracy for specific reaction classes. A random forest (RF) classifier dynamically selects the optimal model for each case, pushing accuracy further and achieving a MAPE reduction of up to 123 percentage points, all while maintaining full model interpretability. In a rigorous out-of-distribution stress test on the WCCR10 data set─containing transition-metal complexes absent from training─both the general LR model and the RF/LR pipeline retain robust performance. Unlike typical neural network models, which often face generalization challenges beyond their training set, our framework maintains stable performance outside its training domain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.