ArticleJournal of medicinal chemistry2025
Structure-Based Generation of 3D Small-Molecule Drugs: Are We There Yet?
Article in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- LinkLlama: Enabling Large Language Model for Chemically Reasonable Linker Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structure-based drug design (SBDD) plays a crucial role in preclinical discovery. Recently, structure-based generative algorithms have been developed to streamline the SBDD process, by generating novel, drug-like molecule designs based on the binding pocket structure of target protein. However, there is no effective metric to evaluate the chemical plausibility of molecules designed by these algorithms, which can limit further applications. In this study, we introduce two new metrics for assessing the chemical plausibility of generated molecules and show that these algorithms can generate chemically implausible structures with certain property distributions that differ from those of known drug-like molecules. We further compare results with high-throughput virtual screening hits for three targets: c-SRC kinase, Smoothened receptor, and dopamine D1 receptor. These metrics and analysis methods described here offer valuable tools for assessing the chemical plausibility and drug-likeness of generated molecules, ultimately enhancing the use of structure-based generation in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.