Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160744›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2025

Model Predictive Control on the Neural Manifold.

Christof Fehrman, C Daniel Meliza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christof FehrmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA christof.fehrman@duke.edu.
C Daniel MelizaDepartment of Psychology and Program in Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA 22904, USA cdm8j@virginia.edu.

Funding

Experience-dependent plasticity of auditory processing for vocal communicationR01DC018621 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MELIZA, CHAD DANIEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural manifolds are an attractive theoretical framework for characterizing the complex behaviors of neural populations. However, many of the tools for identifying these low-dimensional subspaces are correlational and provide limited insight into the underlying dynamics. The ability to precisely control the latent activity of a circuit would allow researchers to investigate the structure and function of neural manifolds. We simulate controlling the latent dynamics of a neural population using closed-loop, dynamically generated sensory inputs. Using a spiking neural network (SNN) as a model of a neural circuit, we find low-dimensional representations of both the network activity (the neural manifold) and a set of salient visual stimuli. The fields of classical and optimal control offer a range of methods to choose from for controlling dynamics on the neural manifold, which differ in performance, computational cost, and ease of implementation. Here, we focus on two commonly used control methods: proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and model predictive control (MPC). PID is a computationally lightweight controller that is simple to implement. In contrast, MPC is a model-based, anticipatory controller with a much higher computational cost and engineering overhead. We evaluate both methods on trajectory-following tasks in latent space, under partial observability and in the presence of unknown noise. While both controllers in some cases were able to successfully control the latent dynamics on the neural manifold, MPC consistently produced more accurate control and required less hyperparameter tuning. These results demonstrate how MPC can be applied on the neural manifold using data-driven dynamics models and provide a framework to experimentally test for causal relationships between manifold dynamics and external stimuli.

Identifiers

PMID41160744
PMCPMC12871436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.