Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160733›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2025

Free-Text Responses in a Nationally Representative Experimental Survey about End-of-Life Care Choices: ChatGPT-4o-Assisted Qualitative Analytical Study.

Elizabeth M Goldberg, Mario Macis, Megan Bounds, Jonathan Gomez Picazo, Lauren Hersch Nicholas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth M GoldbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CU Anschutz, 12631 East 17th Avenue 2nd Floor, Room 2519, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 (303) 724 4712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-0705
Mario MacisDepartment of Economics and Management, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-2752
Megan BoundsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CU Anschutz, 12631 East 17th Avenue 2nd Floor, Room 2519, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 (303) 724 4712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3872-7449
Jonathan Gomez PicazoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CU Anschutz, 12631 East 17th Avenue 2nd Floor, Room 2519, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 (303) 724 4712.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0542-7518
Lauren Hersch NicholasDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, CU Anschutz, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-2849

Funding

Understanding and Respecting End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR01AG059205 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NICHOLAS, LAUREN HERSCH · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how surrogates make end-of-life care choices for patients who lack the ability to make decisions for themselves. Objective: The study aims (1) to identify key themes that emerged from participants' free-text responses to a large nationally representative vignette survey about surrogate decision-making in end-of-life care and (2) to determine if an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot could assist us in accurately and efficiently performing qualitative analyses. Methods: Our dataset included 3931 free-text responses from a nationally representative survey of 6109 individuals. In this qualitative study, we first familiarized ourselves with the free-text responses and hand-coded the first 200 responses until we reached saturation. We then created a codebook, initial themes, subthemes, and illustrative quotes. Subsequently, we prompted ChatGPT-4o to analyze the entire dataset of 3931 responses and identify frequent keywords and generate themes and quotable quotes. We validated responses by comparing the AI's keyword counts to qualitative software (NVivo, Lumivero) counts and cross-validating AI-generated quotes with the original transcripts. Results: We identified several key themes: surrogates more often chose comfort care for care recipients with dementia, particularly at advanced stages. They also strongly weighed the patients' perceived quality of life and functional status. Many reported making surrogate decisions based on their own lived experiences or values, rather than making decisions aligned with the patients' previously stated wishes. There was no significant difference between the AI and qualitative software's keyword counts. The most frequent keywords included "life" (2051/81,713, 2.51%), "quality" (903/81,713, 1.11%), and dementia (507/81,713, 0.62%). Overall, AI-generated themes closely aligned with aforementioned human-generated themes. Manual coding of the first 200 free-text responses required 4 hours, including codebook development. In contrast, ChatGPT-4o generated themes in <10 seconds using the predefined codebook. However, dataset preparation, output verification, iterative prompting, debugging, and validation required several weeks. Conclusions: Surrogates often base end-of-life decisions on dementia stage, perceived quality of life, and their own lived experiences, rather than patient preferences. Using an AI chatbot to perform qualitative analysis on free-text responses may help extend the work of qualitatively trained investigators, especially for large datasets such as free-text responses to large surveys.

Indexed as

Decision MakingTerminal CareAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesChatbotcomfort caregeriatricslife-extending carequalitative researchsurvey

Identifiers

PMID41160733
PMCPMC12571202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.