ArticleCBE life sciences education2025
How Linked Interdisciplinary CUREs Impact Student Social Networks and Thinking About the Value of Other Disciplines.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social Justice, Science Agency, and Collaborations: Using Participatory Science to Enhance Learning Outcomes in Postsecondary STEM Courses.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address global environmental and health problems, scientists must work across disciplinary boundaries. The Science of Team Science is a field of study that examines the processes by which effective scientific teams operate across disciplines. We incorporated strategies from team science into undergraduate courses to help students develop an appreciation of other disciplines and to learn how to create productive science research teams. We then explored student team interactions and interdisciplinary thinking in three course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) in three different disciplines that were linked by complementary research questions in the same system. Through writing prompts scored with the Interdisciplinary Science Rubric, students demonstrated an intermediate level of understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary teams. Social network analysis revealed evidence of students learning from and building trust with students in the other CUREs. This study highlights the benefits of integrating concepts across disciplines in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education to better prepare undergraduates for modern STEM careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.