ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Seeing what you hear: Compression of rat visual perceptual space by task-irrelevant sounds.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain combines information from multiple sensory modalities to build a consistent representation of the world. The principles by which multimodal stimuli are integrated in cortical hierarchies are well studied, but it is less clear whether and how unimodal inputs shape the processing of signals carried by a different modality. In rodents, for instance, direct connections from primary auditory cortex reach visual cortex, but studies disagree on the impact of these projections on visual cortical processing. Both enhancement and suppression of visually evoked responses by auditory inputs have been reported, as well as sharpening of orientation tuning and improvement in the coding of visual information. Little is known, however, about the functional impact of auditory signals on rodent visual perception. Here we trained a group of rats in a visual temporal frequency (TF) classification task, where the visual stimuli to categorize were paired with simultaneous but task-irrelevant auditory stimuli, to prevent high-level multisensory integration and investigate instead the spontaneous, direct impact of auditory signals on the perception of visual stimuli. Rat classification of visual TF was strongly and systematically altered by the presence of sounds, in a way that was determined by sound intensity but not by its temporal modulation. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, we developed a Bayesian ideal observer model, combined with a neural coding scheme where neurons linearly encode visual TF but are inhibited by concomitant sounds by a measure that depends on their intensity. This model captured very precisely the full spectrum of rat perceptual choices we observed, supporting the hypothesis that auditory inputs induce an effective compression of the visual perceptual space. This suggests an important role for inhibition as the key mediator of auditory-visual interactions and provides clear, mechanistic hypotheses to be tested by future work on visual cortical codes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.