Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160626›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

No evidence of direct activation of human neutrophil responses by multivalent prefusion trimeric SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein ex vivo.

Audray Fortin, Sandrine Huot, Elise Caron, Cynthia Laflamme, Amélie Pagliuzza, Nicolas Chomont, Caroline Gilbert, Baoshan Zhang, Peter D Kwong, Marc Pouliot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Audray FortinCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sandrine HuotDivision of Infectious and Immune Diseases, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8332-8555
Elise CaronCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cynthia LaflammeDivision of Infectious and Immune Diseases, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Amélie PagliuzzaCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicolas ChomontCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9747-5018
Caroline GilbertDivision of Infectious and Immune Diseases, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-1180
Baoshan ZhangVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Peter D KwongVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3560-232X
Marc PouliotDivision of Infectious and Immune Diseases, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-5424
Nathalie GrandvauxCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-0284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein is essential for viral entry and serves as the primary immunogen in most COVID-19 vaccines. While its role in adaptive immunity is well defined, its potential to contribute directly to innate immune activation remains incompletely understood. Neutrophils, in particular, are prominent effectors in COVID-19 severity, yet how they respond directly to the S protein presented in a multivalent format is unclear. Here, we investigated whether the S protein can directly activate human neutrophils ex vivo using two biologically relevant models: nanoparticles displaying multivalent stabilized prefusion trimeric S glycoprotein, and purified β-propiolactone-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions. Neutrophils were exposed to nanoparticles or inactivated virus, either alone or pre-coated with monoclonal or polyclonal anti-S antibodies. Nanoparticles displaying Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion (F) protein and purified β-propiolactone-inactivated RSV served as comparators. Across all models and conditions tested, the S protein did not induce significant neutrophil responses. No consistent effects were observed on cell viability, surface marker expression, reactive oxygen species production, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, cytokine release, or inflammatory gene expression-even in the presence of anti-S antibodies mimicking immune complexes. Results with F-nanoparticles and inactivated RSV were similarly modest. These findings indicate that the trimeric prefusion S protein, whether displayed multivalently on nanoparticles or in the context of inactivated viral particles, is insufficient to trigger robust neutrophil activation. This work provides insight into the innate immune profile of the S protein and suggests that its use in vaccine platforms is unlikely to directly provoke neutrophil-mediated inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neutrophil ActivationNeutrophilsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusHumansImmunity, InnateNanoparticlesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41160626
PMCPMC12571262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.