Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The IUCN Red List and newspaper coverage of threatened freshwater eel species in Japan: A variable but limited influence.

Kenzo Kaifu, Hiromi Shiraishi, Atsushi Ishii, Aoi Sugimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenzo KaifuChuo University, 1-4-1 Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-1400
Hiromi ShiraishiChuo University, 1-4-1 Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi IshiiCenter for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Aoi SugimotoGraduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The IUCN Red List is a vital tool for identifying threatened species and raising public awareness. This study examined how the listing of freshwater eels (Anguilla spp.) influenced newspaper coverage in Japan, a major consumer of eels. We analysed 8387 eel-related articles from four major newspapers between 1992 and 2021 using text-mining and statistical methods, along with manual review of a part of the articles. Peaks in article numbers coincided with major events, such as the IUCN listing of the Japanese eel as Endangered in 2014. However, the influence of the Red List was short-lived and limited in strength, with minimal media attention given to non-native eel species such as European eel. Category-specific analysis revealed that issues related to food and trade dominated media coverage, while conservation-focused reporting was less prominent. Our findings suggest that while the Red List can momentarily increase media attention, its impact on long-term public awareness is limited. Strengthening expert engagement, international cooperation, and consumer education could be essential to enhance the conservation impact of the Red List.

Indexed as

AnguillaConservation of Natural ResourcesEelsEndangered SpeciesNewspapers as TopicAnimalsFresh WaterJapan

Identifiers

PMID41160565
PMCPMC12571305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.