ArticlePloS one2025
Phenotypic profiling of small molecules using cell painting assay in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how small molecules affect cellular morphology is essential for exploring their mechanisms of action (MoA) and identifying new therapeutic candidates. In this study, the Cell Painting Assay (CPA) was used to profile 196 small molecules in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells. By applying t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) followed by density-based clustering, 18 distinct phenotypic clusters were identified based on similarities in the quantitative morphological profiles generated from Cell Painting data. Although it was initially hypothesized that clustering would reflect known MoAs, most clusters showed only partial overlap with target-based classifications. Instead, compounds from different MoA classes converged on similar cellular phenotypes, suggesting common downstream effects or shared stress responses. Notably, compounds affecting DNA replication, mitosis, or transcriptional control appeared across multiple clusters, indicating functional diversity within morphologically similar groups. Clusters enriched with mTOR/PI3K inhibitors, spindle poisons, or transcriptional CDK blockers exhibited well-defined phenotypes, supporting the robustness of the assay. In contrast, compounds inducing more subtle phenotypes formed distinct micro-clusters, highlighting the method's sensitivity. Overall, this study demonstrates that CPA can capture convergent phenotypic signatures that extend beyond target-based classification. These findings underscore the value of phenotype-driven screening for the functional annotation of chemical compounds and may help uncover unexpected relationships among molecules with diverse biological activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.