Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160534›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Feminization of the precarious at the UNAM: Examining obstacles to gender equality.

Lu Ciccia, Geraldine Espinosa-Lugo, Graciela Garcia-Guzman, Jaime Gasca-Pineda, Patricia Velez, Laura Espinosa-Asuar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu CicciaCentro de Investigaciones y Estudios de Género, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Geraldine Espinosa-LugoFacultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Graciela Garcia-GuzmanSecretaría Técnica, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Jaime Gasca-PinedaDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Patricia VelezDepartamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.
Laura Espinosa-AsuarDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-8837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The STEM workforce is marked by the persistent underrepresentation of women. Herein, we seek a better understanding of this gender gap in different science disciplines within Latin America. Specifically, we analyzed a case study: the professional development of women in science research institutes of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). This interdisciplinary work analyzed quantitative and qualitative data through an intersectional philosophical lens, employing specific analytical tools drawn from feminist epistemology. We examined the interplay between horizontal and vertical segregation, symbolic and structural obstacles, and economic labor precariousness within the framework of gender norms. Shared trends in the Global North were analyzed to understand the perpetuation of gender stereotypes in the production of scientific knowledge. Additionally, we examined the relationship between the values embedded in gender norms and the cultural capital--here defined as encompassing both economic status and social legitimacy--associated with each discipline. Our findings indicate that, although women are underrepresented in pSTEM, they experience less vertical segregation than their counterparts in STEM related to the Natural Sciences. This suggests that knowledge areas currently associated with the highest cultural capital (pSTEM) may impose primarily symbolic rather than structural barriers for women. By contrast, in fields characterized by less masculine-coded values, women appear to face predominantly structural obstacles, as evidenced by the vertical segregation observed. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the gender biases that exclude women from STEM disciplines.

Indexed as

FeminismFeminizationGender EquityScienceSexismFemaleHumansMaleMexicoUniversities

Identifiers

PMID41160534
PMCPMC12571264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.