Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160364›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Language Access in Two St. Louis Emergency Departments.

Shan A Wang, Julia D López

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shan A WangWashington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA. s.a.wang@wustl.edu.
Julia D LópezDivision ofInfectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St.Louis, MO, USA. julialopez@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-002X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People who prefer a language other than English (LOTE) face barriers across the healthcare system, including hospital emergency departments (EDs). A thematic analysis was employed to gather patient and caregiver perspectives on language access in two St. Louis EDs. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with Spanish-speaking patients and caregivers, and transcripts were analyzed to identify common perceptions of language barriers. Participants reported gaps in video remote interpretation services at security, triage, and during short interactions in the exam room. They also felt obligated to learn English and worried that other patients and staff members judged them for their language preferences. Language-concordant nurses gave patients and caregivers a sense of security through clear communication and advocacy. Participants recommended that the study EDs hire additional bilingual staff members and increase access to video remote interpreters. To reduce health disparities for people who prefer a LOTE, it is essential for emergency departments to gather community perspectives and invest in language service improvements.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunication BarriersEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoLanguageAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedical InterpretingMiddle AgedMissouriEmergency departmentHealthcare accessLanguage accessMidwest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.